🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 164+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

ONLKELLY CHANEE - Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (164 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$28
$46.67
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : HighPattern : FloralDetails : Elasticated waistArticle number : ON321S0SW-A11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

ONLKELLY CHANEE - Shorts

Rise : High
Pattern : Floral
Details : Elasticated waist
Article number : ON321S0SW-A11

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1578601

Category: Women > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price: $46.67 USD

Sale Price: $28 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4399 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· solely-arrived York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless in every way
For the price, the ONLKELLY CHANEE - Shorts is practical and it meets expectations.
2 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· San Jose, CA​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
it does the job which feels reasonable.
33 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exactly what I needed
Personally, the ONLKELLY CHANEE - Shorts performs as expected and it works for me. Works fine so far.​
50 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous investment
the ONLKELLY CHANEE - Shorts performs as expected and I don’t regret it.
35 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
At first, it works well enough and I don’t regret it.
16 people found this helpful