๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 821+ reviews
Menโœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

MOSS SWEATER - Jumper - dark sage

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.1 out of 5 (821 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$205​
$341.67
Sale
โœ“ at no charge shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Neckline : Crew neckPattern : PlainArticle number : F1422Q04R-B11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
expedient Shipping

โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

MOSS SWEATER - Jumper - dark sage

Neckline : Crew neck
Pattern : Plain
Article number : F1422Q04R-B11

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1413176

Category: Men > Clothing > Knitwear

Original Price: $341.67 USD

Sale Price: $205 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 6285 reviews

CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Fresno, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it
Personally, it works well enough so no complaints.
43 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
faultless MOSS SWEATER - Jumper - dark sage
The MOSS SWEATER - Jumper - dark sage is well constructed.
21 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Chicago, IL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fancy it!
In daily use, the MOSS SWEATER - Jumper - dark sage works fine and it meets expectations.
24 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท Chicago, IL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Super happy
The MOSS SWEATER - Jumper - dark sage is straightforward.
4 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds โœ“ Verified Purchase 
8 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
ultimate purchase ever
From my experience, it is effortless to use which is good enough.
22 people found this helpful