🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 129+ reviews
Menβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

ARDEN - retro ankle boots

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (129 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$550
$916.67
Sale
βœ“ at no charge distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Shoe tip : RoundFastening : Slip onDetails : Elastic insertArticle number : ST512K00E-Q11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
immediate Shipping

↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

ARDEN - timeless ankle boots

Shoe tip : Round
Fastening : Slip on
Details : Elastic insert
Article number : ST512K00E-Q11

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1280680

Category: Men > Shoes > Boots

Original Price: $916.67 USD

Sale Price: $550 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4629 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
The ARDEN - timeless ankle boots is fairly uncomplicated to operate.
19 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 weeks ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
Happy with the speed and quality ARDEN - vintage ankle boots.
40 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall
2 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
After certain use, it does the job and it’s fine overall.
43 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely flawless
Honestly, the ARDEN - enduring ankle boots is practical which is good enough.
41 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific find!
At first, the ARDEN - retro ankle boots performs as expected so it’s acceptable.
15 people found this helpful