🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 126+ reviews
Beautyβœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Rusk shampoo

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (126 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10.2
$17
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rusk brightening shampoo for blondes, gray, platinum & white hair. Brand newly-released, not ever used

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid Shipping
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Rusk shampoo

Rusk brightening shampoo for blondes, gray, platinum & white hair. Brand latest, not once used

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1014105

Category: Beauty > Hair Care > Shampoos

Original Price: $17 USD

Sale Price: $10.2 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7034 reviews
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality​
After some use, the Rusk shampoo is basic to use so no complaints.
47 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Fresno, CA 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest purchase ever
For the price, the Rusk shampoo is uncomplicated to use and it works for me.
27 people found this helpful
AD​
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
delightful product
For the price, the Rusk shampoo is practical and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
1 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
Honestly, it is functional to use and it meets expectations.
30 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific product
After assorted use, the Rusk shampoo performs as expected and it works for me. Works fine so far.
48 people found this helpful