🚚 FREE SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 940+ reviews
Outdoor βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (940 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$32
$53.33
Sale
βœ“ Free shipping on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage lot of various laundry sprinklers which were popular before the steam iron was invented in the 1970s.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
Fast Shipping
↩️
Easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers

Vintage lot of various laundry sprinklers which were popular before the steam iron was invented in the 1970s.

This product is perfect for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1349907

Category: Outdoor > Watering Equipment > Hose Nozzles

Original Price: $53.33 USD

Sale Price: $32 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand New

🚚 Shipping & Returns

βœ“ FREE Shipping on orders over $50

Standard Delivery: 3-5 business days

Express Delivery: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 940 reviews
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five Stars for Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers
Overall, I’m satisfied with the Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers.
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Amazing Quality
To be fair, the Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers performs as expected and it’s fine overall.
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Best Purchase Ever
From my experience, the Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers is practical and it’s fine overall.
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Love this Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers!
From my experience, the Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Nothing fancy.
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified
1 week ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Great Value for Money
Personally, the Vintage Lot of Laundry Sprinklers works well enough so it’s acceptable. Packaging was simple.