🚚 FREE SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 185+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

ASICS Unisex Waistpack

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (185 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.95
$21.58
Sale
βœ“ Free shipping on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Fabric type: 85% Polyester/15% PolyurethaneCare instructions: Machine WashOrigin: ImportedLightweight stretch fabricZippered pocket openingReflective logoJacquared Adjustable beltEasy hang loop

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
Fast Shipping
↩️
Easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

ASICS Unisex Waistpack

  • Fabric type: 85% Polyester/15% Polyurethane
  • Care instructions: Machine Wash
  • Origin: Imported
  • Lightweight stretch fabric
  • Zippered pocket opening
  • Reflective logo
  • Jacquared Adjustable belt
  • Easy hang loop

This product is perfect for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 311884

Category: Men > ACCESSORIES > Belts

Original Price: $21.58 USD

Sale Price: $12.95 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand New

🚚 Shipping & Returns

βœ“ FREE Shipping on orders over $50

Standard Delivery: 3-5 business days

Express Delivery: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 185 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Love this ASICS Unisex Waistpack!
So far, the ASICS Unisex Waistpack performs as expected so I’m okay with it. Shipping was normal.
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five Stars for ASICS Unisex Waistpack
It’s an okay product overall, the ASICS Unisex Waistpack.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
Honestly, the ASICS Unisex Waistpack works fine so I’m okay with it.
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Best Purchase Ever
The ASICS Unisex Waistpack works exactly as expected.
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Amazing Quality
Personally, the ASICS Unisex Waistpack performs as expected and it works for me. Works fine so far.