๐Ÿšš FREE SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 670+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.1 out of 5 (670 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$112
$186.67
Sale
โœ“ Free shipping on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Heel type : Block heel, platform toeFastening : Slip onPattern : PlainDetails : Cut-outs, moccasin seam, rhinestonesArticle number : DK111E01S-A11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
Fast Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
Easy Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons

Heel type : Block heel, platform toe
Fastening : Slip on
Pattern : Plain
Details : Cut-outs, moccasin seam, rhinestones
Article number : DK111E01S-A11

This product is perfect for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 6180

Category: Women > Shoes > Flat shoes

Original Price: $186.67 USD

Sale Price: $112 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand New

๐Ÿšš Shipping & Returns

โœ“ FREE Shipping on orders over $50

Standard Delivery: 3-5 business days

Express Delivery: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 670 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds โœ“ Verified
4 days ago
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exactly What I Needed
For the price, the BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons works well enough so itโ€™s acceptable. Nothing fancy.
JB
Justin Baker โœ“ Verified
2 months ago
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Perfect for BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons
To be fair, the BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons performs as expected and it works for me.
RM
Robert Martinez โœ“ Verified
2 months ago
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Amazing Quality
After a few days, the BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons feels okay so Iโ€™m okay with it.
AC
Amber Carter โœ“ Verified
1 month ago
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Great Value for Money
Honestly, the BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons works as described which feels reasonable.
MK
Megan King โœ“ Verified
1 week ago
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exactly What I Needed
To be fair, the BLEVINS LOAFER - Slip-ons feels solid which feels reasonable. Packaging was simple.